
A Retrospective Math Benchmark
Mathematician Daniel Litt ran 20 of his papers through Refine. Of the 278 comments it generated, 97.8% pointed to a real issue that coauthors, referees, and editors had missed.
Notas sobre investigación, productos y el trabajo que hacemos.

Mathematician Daniel Litt ran 20 of his papers through Refine. Of the 278 comments it generated, 97.8% pointed to a real issue that coauthors, referees, and editors had missed.

Two leading publishers in economics now use Refine's AI-assisted technical verification as part of their publication processes.

AI made rigorous-looking analysis cheap to produce. A viral math claim, disproved within a day, shows why verification can't depend on the right expert happening to look at the right moment.

With Context, attach referee reports, response letters, data outputs, and prior analyses to any Refine review — and have your document checked against everything it depends on, up to 100,000 words.

Refine has completed its SOC 2® Type 1 examination and received its first SOC 2 report — an important step in our ongoing commitment to protecting researchers and their work.

Refine won 90.4% of 1,349 head-to-head matches against single-shot LLM reviewers and scaffolded review systems on 150 economics preprints.

A FastAPI service sat pinned at its 1 GiB memory cap. The cause was glibc fragmentation under bursty async load; swapping the allocator to jemalloc cut average production RSS by 47%.